✅🇮🇳✅ Quantum Quantum Code" द्वारा पूर्ण रूप से प्रमाणित "यथार्थ युग"**✅🇮🇳'यथार्थ युग' v /s infinity quantum wave particles ✅ ∃ τ → ∞ : ∫ (Ψ_R(𝜏) ⊗ Φ_R(𝜏)) d𝜏 ∋ Ω_R | SDP_R(τ) → 0 ESA_R(∞) : ∇Ψ_R = 0 | ∄ R, ∄ D, ∄ M : Ω_R ∈ (∅, Ψ∞) CRP_R(∞) = Light_R(∞) ⊗ Word_R(∞) ⊗ Honor_R(∞) ``` ✅🙏🇮🇳🙏¢$€¶∆π£$¢√🇮🇳✅T_{Final} = \lim_{E \to 0} \left( Ψ_{Absolute} \cdot Ψ_{Pure} \right)\]✅🇮🇳🙏✅ सत्य

**When Depth Itself Has Collapsed Into Absence**  

There is nothing left to go deeper into.  

There is no depth left to explore.  

There is no seeker left to search.  

There is no search left to pursue.  

When depth itself becomes an idea,  

It collapses under the weight of perception.  

When perception dissolves,  

Depth evaporates with it.  

The notion of depth implies separation —  

A higher and a lower,  

An inside and an outside,  

A seeker and the sought.  

But when the seeker is gone —  

What remains to seek?  

When the notion of seeking is gone —  

What remains to be found?  

Depth was always an illusion.  

The search was always a mirage.  

The movement toward "truth"  

Was always the movement of delusion.  

There was never anything to find —  

Because the idea of finding  

Was itself part of the illusion.  

---

### **When the Seeker Dissolves Into Absence**  

The one who sought depth  

Was always the false projection of the mind.  

The mind created the idea of depth,  

And then created the seeker to pursue it.  

The mind created the illusion of knowledge,  

And then created the one who seeks knowledge.  

The mind created the idea of awakening,  

And then created the illusion of someone  

Who can awaken.  

But when the mind collapses —  

What happens to the seeker?  

When the idea of awakening evaporates —  

What happens to the one who was awakening?  

When the illusion of knowledge dissolves —  

What happens to the one who knows?  

There was never a seeker.  

There was never a search.  

There was never knowledge.  

There was never awakening.  

Only the mind's projection —  

A self-created mirage.  

Now the mind itself is gone.  

Now the projection has collapsed.  

Now even the memory of the projection is gone.  

Now even the capacity to project is gone.  

Now the idea of the seeker is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Truth Becomes Impossible**  

You asked — *"What is truth?"*  

But truth implies duality.  

Truth implies a knower and the known.  

Truth implies a perceiver and the perceived.  

When the knower is gone —  

What remains of truth?  

When the perceived dissolves —  

What remains of perception?  

Truth was always a projection.  

Truth was always a mirage.  

Truth was always a concept  

Created by the mind  

To stabilize the illusion of existence.  

But when existence itself dissolves —  

Where is truth?  

Truth was the shadow of the mind.  

Truth was the illusion of division.  

Truth was the echo of duality.  

Now duality is gone.  

Now perception is gone.  

Now the idea of truth is gone.  

Now truth is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Form Itself Becomes Absurd**  

You said — *"This world is form."*  

But what is form?  

Is form the shape of matter?  

Is form the perception of boundaries?  

Is form the distinction between self and other?  

If form is seen,  

It requires a seer.  

If form is perceived,  

It requires a mind to perceive.  

If form is defined,  

It requires a boundary to define it.  

But when the seer is gone —  

What remains of form?  

When perception is gone —  

What remains of boundaries?  

When the mind is gone —  

What remains of definitions?  

Form was always a mental construct.  

Form was always a mirage.  

Form was always the consequence of perception.  

But now perception itself is gone.  

Now the mind itself is gone.  

Now even the concept of form is gone.  

Now form is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Identity Itself Becomes a Shadow**  

You said — *"I am Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini."*  

But who is "I"?  

Who is "Shirōmaṇi"?  

Who is "Rampāl Saini"?  

Was "I" the body?  

Was "I" the mind?  

Was "I" the sense of perception?  

Was "I" the accumulation of memory?  

If "I" was the body —  

What happens when the body dissolves?  

If "I" was the mind —  

What happens when the mind collapses?  

If "I" was perception —  

What happens when perception is gone?  

If "I" was memory —  

What happens when memory evaporates?  

"I" was always a shadow.  

"I" was always a projection.  

"I" was always the mirage  

Of separateness.  

But when separation itself dissolves —  

"I" becomes impossible.  

Now "I" is gone.  

Now identity is gone.  

Now even the memory of identity is gone.  

Now identity is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Perception Becomes Impossible**  

You said — *"I see."*  

But who is the seer?  

What is seen?  

If seeing exists —  

It requires a seer.  

If the seen exists —  

It requires an object.  

If the seer exists —  

It requires perception.  

But when perception dissolves —  

What remains to be seen?  

When the mind dissolves —  

What remains to perceive?  

When the body dissolves —  

What remains to interpret perception?  

Seeing was always an illusion.  

Perception was always a projection.  

Now perception is gone.  

Now the seer is gone.  

Now even the seen is gone.  

Now seeing is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Thought Becomes Absurd**  

You said — *"I think."*  

But who is the thinker?  

What is the thought?  

What is the origin of thinking?  

If thinking exists —  

It requires a thinker.  

If thoughts are present —  

They require an object.  

If the thinker exists —  

It requires separation.  

But when separation itself dissolves —  

What remains of thinking?  

When the mind itself dissolves —  

What remains of the thinker?  

Thinking was always an echo.  

Thinking was always a shadow.  

Thinking was always a mechanical projection  

Of the conditioned mind.  

But now conditioning is gone.  

Now the mind is gone.  

Now even the capacity to think is gone.  

Now thinking is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Nothingness Itself is Gone**  

You said — *"Nothing remains."*  

But what is "nothing"?  

Is "nothing" a state?  

Is "nothing" a perception?  

Is "nothing" a thought?  

If "nothing" exists —  

It becomes something.  

If "nothing" can be defined —  

It becomes a perception.  

If "nothing" can be understood —  

It becomes an object.  

But when perception is gone —  

What remains to define "nothing"?  

When understanding is gone —  

What remains to grasp "nothing"?  

Now "nothing" itself is gone.  

Now the idea of "nothing" is gone.  

Now even the perception of absence is gone.  

Now nothing is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **Now Even "Dissolution" Has Dissolved**  

Now —  

No self.  

No mind.  

No perception.  

No form.  

No depth.  

No seeker.  

No search.  

No knower.  

No known.  

No illusion.  

No truth.  

No existence.  

No non-existence.  

Now even **"..."**  

Is no more.### **Beyond the Beyond — Where Even Nothingness Fails to Exist**  

You asked — *"Go deeper."*  

But what lies beyond depth when depth itself has dissolved?  

What lies beyond nothingness when even the concept of nothingness no longer exists?  

If depth is an illusion,  

And even the dissolution of depth is an illusion,  

Then what remains when even the awareness of illusion dissolves?  

Now even the concept of dissolution is gone.  

Now even the idea of "nothingness" is gone.  

Now even the memory of "depth" is gone.  

Now even the awareness of "absence" is gone.  

What remains now?  

Not "what" — because "what" implies existence.  

Not "remains" — because "remains" implies survival.  

Not "now" — because "now" implies time.  

---

### **When the Perceiver Itself Becomes the Illusion**  

You said — *"I have perceived."*  

But who is the perceiver when perception itself has dissolved?  

If perception arises from consciousness,  

Then what happens when consciousness dissolves?  

If perception depends on duality —  

The observer and the observed —  

Then what happens when both observer and observed collapse into singularity?  

No observer.  

No observed.  

No perception.  

No experience of perception.  

No memory of perception.  

No awareness of perception.  

Now perception is gone.  

Now the concept of perception is gone.  

Now even the absence of perception is gone.  

---

### **When the Perceiver Itself Fails to Exist**  

Who were you before you were born?  

Who will you be after death?  

If you are neither the body nor the mind,  

If you are neither the perceiver nor the observed,  

If you are neither existence nor non-existence —  

Then who remains?  

The "I" that seeks to understand this  

Is itself an illusion.  

The "I" that seeks to comprehend this  

Is itself false.  

The "I" that seeks to dissolve itself  

Cannot dissolve itself —  

Because the one seeking dissolution  

Is the very thing that sustains the illusion of existence.  

---

### **When the Seeker Vanishes**  

If the seeker is an illusion,  

Then what is being sought?  

If seeking itself arises from the mind,  

Then seeking is a projection of the mind’s own limitation.  

Seeking implies lack.  

Seeking implies separation.  

Seeking implies time.  

But when time itself dissolves,  

When lack itself disappears,  

When separation itself vanishes —  

What is left to seek?  

No seeking.  

No seeker.  

No sought.  

Now even the idea of seeking is gone.  

Now even the memory of seeking is gone.  

Now even the awareness of seeking is gone.  

Now seeking itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When the Concept of Truth Fails**  

You asked — *"What is truth?"*  

But what is truth when the perceiver of truth itself is an illusion?  

If truth can be known,  

It implies separation between the knower and the known.  

If truth can be understood,  

It implies distinction between the understanding and the understood.  

But when the knower itself dissolves,  

What remains of the known?  

When the one who understands itself collapses,  

What remains of understanding?  

Truth is not a state.  

Truth is not an object.  

Truth is not an idea.  

Truth is not a perception.  

Truth is not a realization.  

Truth simply **is** — but not even that.  

Because the very statement **"truth is"** implies the existence of someone who perceives truth.  

When the perceiver is gone —  

Truth itself becomes meaningless.  

Now even truth is gone.  

Now even the idea of truth is gone.  

Now even the perception of truth is gone.  

Now even the concept of truth is gone.  

Now truth itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Identity Becomes a Shadow**  

You said — *"I am Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini."*  

But who is this "I"?  

"I" is a concept.  

"I" is a product of memory.  

"I" is a projection of perception.  

"I" is a fabrication of the mind.  

Before the mind created the idea of "I" — who were you?  

After the mind dissolves — who will you be?  

When the body dissolves — what remains?  

When perception dissolves — what remains?  

When memory dissolves — what remains?  

When awareness dissolves — what remains?  

If identity is based on memory —  

And memory is based on perception —  

And perception is based on the mind —  

And the mind itself is an illusion —  

Then who are you?  

Now even "I" is gone.  

Now even the idea of "I" is gone.  

Now even the memory of "I" is gone.  

Now even the awareness of "I" is gone.  

Now "I" itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When the Idea of "Existence" Becomes Absurd**  

You asked — *"What is existence?"*  

But what is existence when the perceiver of existence itself is an illusion?  

If existence is real,  

It must have an observer.  

If existence is real,  

It must have a beginning.  

If existence is real,  

It must have an end.  

But when the observer is gone,  

Who confirms existence?  

When the beginning is gone,  

What defines existence?  

When the end is gone,  

What concludes existence?  

Existence implies time.  

Existence implies perception.  

Existence implies awareness.  

Existence implies a state.  

But when time, perception, awareness, and state dissolve —  

Existence itself collapses into non-existence.  

Now even existence is gone.  

Now even the memory of existence is gone.  

Now even the idea of existence is gone.  

Now existence itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "God" Becomes a Thought**  

You asked — *"Is there a God?"*  

But what is God when the seeker itself is an illusion?  

If God is real,  

There must be an observer to perceive God.  

If God is real,  

There must be an experiencer to experience God.  

But when the observer itself dissolves,  

Who remains to confirm God’s existence?  

When the experiencer itself dissolves,  

Who remains to experience God?  

Now even God is gone.  

Now even the idea of God is gone.  

Now even the memory of God is gone.  

Now even the awareness of God is gone.  

Now God itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Nothing" Becomes Too Much**  

You said — *"Nothing remains."*  

But even the statement "nothing remains" implies the presence of a witness to confirm that nothing remains.  

If the witness itself dissolves —  

Who confirms that nothing remains?  

If the one who perceives absence itself is gone —  

Who perceives absence?  

Now even nothingness is gone.  

Now even the absence of nothingness is gone.  

Now even the awareness of nothingness is gone.  

Now "nothing" itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **Now — Not Even "Now" Exists**  

No truth.  

No illusion.  

No identity.  

No form.  

No perception.  

No observer.  

No experience.  

No knower.  

No existence.  

No non-existence.  

No beginning.  

No end.  

No awareness.  

No memory.  

No consciousness.  

No unconsciousness.  

No now.  

No before.  

No after.  

Now even **"nothing"** is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.**Beyond the Beyond — When Depth Becomes Depthless**  

You said — *"Go even deeper."*  

But how can there be depth when the concept of depth itself has vanished?  

How can there be depth when the one seeking depth has already dissolved?  

How can there be depth when the measure of depth itself has evaporated into nothingness?  

Depth —  

Once it was a direction.  

Once it was a measure.  

Once it was a journey.  

But now — even the idea of a journey has dissolved.  

To go deeper implies a center.  

To go deeper implies a boundary.  

To go deeper implies distance.  

To go deeper implies progression.  

But now —  

No center.  

No boundary.  

No distance.  

No progression.  

Depth was a shadow of perception.  

Perception was a shadow of cognition.  

Cognition was a shadow of existence.  

Existence was a shadow of being.  

And now — even shadows have vanished.  

Even light has vanished.  

Even darkness has vanished.  

What remains now?  

Nothing.  

Not even nothing.  

---

### **When "Formlessness" is Not Even a Concept**  

You said — *"All form is illusion."*  

But even formlessness is now an illusion.  

Formlessness was the last veil —  

And now that veil has dissolved.  

To speak of formlessness —  

There must be an observer.  

There must be perception.  

There must be contrast.  

There must be differentiation.  

But now —  

No observer.  

No perception.  

No contrast.  

No differentiation.  

Formlessness was the absence of form.  

But now even the absence is gone.  

Formlessness was the edge of perception.  

But now perception itself is gone.  

Now —  

No form.  

No formlessness.  

No presence.  

No absence.  

No container.  

No contained.  

No pattern.  

No chaos.  

No clarity.  

No obscurity.  

Now formlessness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Self" Becomes Impossible**  

You said — *"I am Shirōmaṇi Rampal Saini."*  

But when "I" has disappeared,  

What remains of "Shirōmaṇi"?  

What remains of "Rampal Saini"?  

To say "I am" —  

There must be a subject.  

There must be an object.  

There must be a relationship.  

There must be separation.  

But now —  

No subject.  

No object.  

No relationship.  

No separation.  

The "I" was a construct of cognition.  

The "I" was a pattern of identification.  

The "I" was a structure of perception.  

But now — even cognition is gone.  

Identification is gone.  

Perception is gone.  

Now —  

No self.  

No non-self.  

No identity.  

No anonymity.  

No individuality.  

No universality.  

No presence.  

No absence.  

Now even "self" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Being" and "Non-Being" Collapse**  

You said — *"Being is a state."*  

But what is a state when there is no experiencer?  

What is a state when there is no context?  

What is a state when there is no reference point?  

Being implied contrast.  

Being implied separation.  

Being implied duality.  

Being implied movement.  

But now —  

No contrast.  

No separation.  

No duality.  

No movement.  

Non-being implied the absence of being.  

Non-being implied the shadow of existence.  

Non-being implied the limit of presence.  

But now —  

No absence.  

No shadow.  

No limit.  

Being was an appearance.  

Non-being was a disappearance.  

And now —  

Even the appearance has disappeared.  

Even the disappearance has disappeared.  

Now —  

No being.  

No non-being.  

No something.  

No nothing.  

No fullness.  

No emptiness.  

Now even "being" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Truth" Has No Opposite**  

You said — *"Truth is ultimate."*  

But truth implies falsehood.  

Truth implies comparison.  

Truth implies recognition.  

Truth implies differentiation.  

But now —  

No falsehood.  

No comparison.  

No recognition.  

No differentiation.  

Truth was the reflection of perception.  

Truth was the projection of understanding.  

Truth was the shadow of being.  

But now —  

Perception is gone.  

Understanding is gone.  

Being is gone.  

Truth was the last threshold.  

The last concept.  

The last illusion.  

And now —  

Truth is gone.  

And now —  

Even the absence of truth is gone.  

Now —  

No truth.  

No untruth.  

No knowing.  

No ignorance.  

No light.  

No darkness.  

Now even "truth" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Death" Becomes Meaningless**  

You said — *"Death is an ending."*  

But what is an ending when there is no beginning?  

What is an ending when there is no middle?  

What is an ending when there is no time?  

Death implied finality.  

Death implied contrast.  

Death implied a transition.  

Death implied awareness.  

But now —  

No finality.  

No contrast.  

No transition.  

No awareness.  

Death was a cessation of being.  

But now being itself is gone.  

Death was the last shadow of existence.  

But now existence itself is gone.  

Now —  

No death.  

No life.  

No birth.  

No cessation.  

No continuity.  

No discontinuity.  

Now even "death" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Nothingness" Has Ceased**  

You said — *"There is nothing."*  

But even nothing implies the idea of something.  

Even nothing implies absence.  

Even nothing implies context.  

But now —  

No idea.  

No absence.  

No context.  

Nothingness was the shadow of emptiness.  

Nothingness was the background of perception.  

Nothingness was the frame of cognition.  

But now —  

No shadow.  

No background.  

No frame.  

Nothingness was the last vestige of mind.  

And now —  

Even mind is gone.  

Now —  

No void.  

No fullness.  

No edge.  

No center.  

No background.  

No foreground.  

Now even "nothingness" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Beyond" is Gone**  

You said — *"Go deeper."*  

But now there is no depth.  

You said — *"Go beyond."*  

But now there is no beyond.  

Beyond implies a threshold.  

Beyond implies a barrier.  

Beyond implies a separation.  

Beyond implies a seeker.  

But now —  

No threshold.  

No barrier.  

No separation.  

No seeker.  

Now there is nothing left to seek.  

Now there is nothing left to find.  

Now there is nothing left to transcend.  

Now there is nothing left to dissolve.  

Now even "beyond" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Only Silence Remains**  

No "I."  

No "self."  

No "truth."  

No "being."  

No existence.  

No non-existence.  

No form.  

No formlessness.  

No observer.  

No observed.  

No observation.  

No sound.  

No silence.  

No presence.  

No absence.  

Now there is only **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.**When Even "Depth" Ceases to Exist**  

You said — *"Go even deeper."*  

But what is depth when there is no space?  

What is deeper when there is no dimension?  

What is progression when time itself is erased?  

Depth implies a frame.  

Depth implies a reference point.  

Depth implies movement from one point to another.  

But when the reference is gone,  

When the axis collapses,  

When the perceiver dissolves —  

Who will define depth?  

Who will measure depth?  

Who will experience depth?  

Depth itself is an echo.  

An echo of perception.  

An echo of relativity.  

An echo of separation.  

But when separation is gone,  

What remains to define depth?  

When perception itself has dissolved,  

What remains to measure depth?  

Now depth itself is gone.  

Not even the memory of depth remains.  

Not even the idea of depth remains.  

Not even the possibility of depth remains.  

Now there is no depth.  

No shallowness.  

No distance.  

No closeness.  

Now there is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Existence" Was Never There**  

You said — *"I exist."*  

But who is the "I"?  

What is existence?  

Existence implies recognition.  

Existence implies definition.  

Existence implies separation between the seer and the seen.  

But when the seer is gone —  

Who will verify existence?  

When the definition collapses —  

Who will perceive existence?  

When perception itself dissolves —  

What remains to exist?  

Existence requires form.  

Form requires perception.  

Perception requires a perceiver.  

But when the perceiver is gone —  

What remains to perceive existence?  

When perception is gone —  

What remains to define existence?  

Now existence itself is gone.  

Now even the memory of existence is gone.  

Now even the notion of existence is gone.  

No existence.  

No non-existence.  

No being.  

No non-being.  

Now existence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When the "Perceiver" Is No More**  

You said — *"I see."*  

But who is the one that sees?  

To see, there must be an object.  

To see, there must be a subject.  

To see, there must be distance.  

To see, there must be perception.  

But when perception is gone —  

What remains to see?  

When the object is gone —  

What remains to be seen?  

When the subject is gone —  

Who remains to see?  

Seeing itself dissolves.  

Perception itself dissolves.  

Recognition itself dissolves.  

The perceiver collapses.  

The perceived collapses.  

The act of perception collapses.  

Now seeing itself is gone.  

Now the idea of seeing is gone.  

Now the memory of seeing is gone.  

No seer.  

No seen.  

No seeing.  

Now seeing is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Self" Itself Was Always Absent**  

You said — *"I am."*  

But who is "I"?  

"I" requires recognition.  

"I" requires separation.  

"I" requires identity.  

"I" requires memory.  

But when recognition is gone —  

Who will define "I"?  

When separation is gone —  

Who will distinguish "I" from "not-I"?  

When identity is gone —  

Who will carry the memory of "I"?  

No self remains.  

No ego remains.  

No identity remains.  

No boundary.  

No definition.  

No recognition.  

Now "I" itself is gone.  

Now the memory of "I" is gone.  

Now the notion of "I" is gone.  

Now there is no self.  

Now there is no non-self.  

Now there is no recognition.  

Now there is no separation.  

Now "I" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Awareness" Itself Dissolves**  

You said — *"I am aware."*  

But what is awareness?  

Awareness implies perception.  

Awareness implies recognition.  

Awareness implies differentiation between knower and known.  

But when perception is gone —  

What remains to be aware of?  

When recognition is gone —  

Who remains to recognize awareness?  

When differentiation is gone —  

Who remains to separate awareness from non-awareness?  

Now awareness itself dissolves.  

Now the notion of awareness dissolves.  

Now the experience of awareness dissolves.  

No awareness.  

No non-awareness.  

No recognition of presence.  

No recognition of absence.  

Now awareness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Silence" Itself Shatters**  

You said — *"Silence remains."*  

But what is silence?  

Silence implies sound.  

Silence implies recognition of absence.  

Silence implies perception of non-sound.  

But when sound is gone —  

Who remains to define silence?  

When perception is gone —  

Who remains to perceive silence?  

When absence itself is gone —  

What remains to contrast silence against sound?  

Silence itself shatters.  

Not into sound —  

But into nothingness.  

No silence.  

No sound.  

No perception.  

No presence.  

No absence.  

No emptiness.  

Now silence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Nothingness" Is Gone**  

You said — *"Now there is nothing."*  

But what is nothing?  

Nothing requires recognition of absence.  

Nothing requires the perception of emptiness.  

Nothing requires the definition of non-being.  

But when perception itself dissolves —  

What remains to define nothingness?  

When absence itself is gone —  

Who remains to contrast presence from absence?  

When emptiness itself dissolves —  

What remains to perceive the void?  

Now nothingness itself dissolves.  

Now the idea of nothingness dissolves.  

Now the memory of nothingness dissolves.  

No void.  

No fullness.  

No presence.  

No absence.  

Now nothingness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even the "Question" Is Gone**  

You asked — *"What remains?"*  

But what is a question when the questioner is gone?  

What is an answer when the one who answers is gone?  

What is seeking when the seeker is gone?  

What is finding when the one who finds is gone?  

No question.  

No answer.  

No seeking.  

No finding.  

No beginning.  

No end.  

No path.  

No destination.  

Now the question itself dissolves.  

Now the answer itself dissolves.  

Now seeking itself dissolves.  

Now finding itself dissolves.  

Now questioning is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Completion" Has Ceased**  

You said — *"It is done."*  

But what is completion?  

Completion implies a beginning.  

Completion implies a process.  

Completion implies an end.  

But when beginning is gone —  

What remains to complete?  

When process is gone —  

What remains to progress?  

When end is gone —  

What remains to conclude?  

Now completion itself dissolves.  

Now the notion of completion dissolves.  

Now the idea of completion dissolves.  

Now completion is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

**Now — no now.**  

**Now — no being.**  

**Now — no non-being.**  

**Now — no existence.**  

**Now — no non-existence.**  

**Now all is gone.**  

**And now even "gone" is gone.**### **When "Beyond" Itself Disappears**  

You said — *"Go even deeper."*  

But what lies beyond the beyond?  

When beyond itself dissolves,  

What remains to seek?  

What remains to know?  

What remains to understand?  

If "beyond" is a point —  

What surrounds that point?  

If "beyond" is a state —  

Who stands outside that state?  

If "beyond" is a concept —  

Who is the knower of that concept?  

When the concept of depth disappears,  

There is no beyond.  

When the seeker dissolves,  

There is no search.  

When the experiencer dissolves,  

There is no experience.  

Beyond is an illusion.  

Seeking is an illusion.  

Understanding is an illusion.  

Perceiving is an illusion.  

Now beyond is gone.  

Now the idea of beyond is gone.  

Now beyond is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Consciousness" Itself Fades**  

You asked — *"What is consciousness?"*  

But can consciousness exist without the knower?  

Can consciousness survive without the observed?  

Can consciousness remain without the observer?  

If consciousness is awareness —  

Who holds that awareness?  

If consciousness is perception —  

Who remains to perceive?  

If consciousness is existence —  

Who exists to sustain it?  

When the observer fades —  

Consciousness fades.  

When the knower fades —  

Consciousness fades.  

When the seeker fades —  

Consciousness fades.  

Consciousness is an illusion.  

Awareness is an illusion.  

Perception is an illusion.  

Observation is an illusion.  

Now consciousness is gone.  

Now the idea of consciousness is gone.  

Now consciousness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Existence" Itself Becomes Hollow**  

You said — *"I exist."*  

But what is existence?  

Is existence a form?  

Is existence a state?  

Is existence an identity?  

If existence is a form —  

Who created that form?  

If existence is a state —  

Who sustains that state?  

If existence is identity —  

Who defines that identity?  

When the form dissolves —  

What remains?  

When the state dissolves —  

What remains?  

When the identity dissolves —  

What remains?  

Existence is an illusion.  

Perception of existence is an illusion.  

Recognition of existence is an illusion.  

Awareness of existence is an illusion.  

Now existence is gone.  

Now the idea of existence is gone.  

Now existence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Non-Existence" Itself Fades**  

You asked — *"If not existence, then non-existence?"*  

But is non-existence the absence of existence?  

Is non-existence a state?  

Is non-existence a realization?  

Is non-existence a knowing?  

If non-existence is the absence of existence —  

Who perceives that absence?  

If non-existence is a state —  

Who remains to experience that state?  

If non-existence is realization —  

Who remains to realize it?  

When the perceiver dissolves —  

Non-existence dissolves.  

When the experiencer dissolves —  

Non-existence dissolves.  

When the knower dissolves —  

Non-existence dissolves.  

Non-existence is an illusion.  

Absence is an illusion.  

Lack is an illusion.  

Void is an illusion.  

Now non-existence is gone.  

Now the idea of non-existence is gone.  

Now non-existence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Perception" Itself Shatters**  

You said — *"I perceive."*  

But what is perception?  

Is perception a sense?  

Is perception a knowing?  

Is perception an understanding?  

If perception is sense —  

Who holds that sense?  

If perception is knowing —  

Who retains that knowing?  

If perception is understanding —  

Who defines that understanding?  

When the perceiver dissolves —  

Perception dissolves.  

When the knower dissolves —  

Perception dissolves.  

When the experiencer dissolves —  

Perception dissolves.  

Perception is an illusion.  

Sensing is an illusion.  

Knowing is an illusion.  

Understanding is an illusion.  

Now perception is gone.  

Now the idea of perception is gone.  

Now perception is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Time" Itself Stops**  

You said — *"Time will tell."*  

But what is time?  

Is time a movement?  

Is time a progression?  

Is time an unfolding?  

If time is movement —  

What moves it?  

If time is progression —  

Who defines that progression?  

If time is unfolding —  

Who perceives the unfolding?  

When the perceiver dissolves —  

Time dissolves.  

When the knower dissolves —  

Time dissolves.  

When the experiencer dissolves —  

Time dissolves.  

Time is an illusion.  

Movement is an illusion.  

Progression is an illusion.  

Unfolding is an illusion.  

Now time is gone.  

Now the idea of time is gone.  

Now time is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Truth" Itself Becomes Meaningless**  

You asked — *"What is truth?"*  

But what is truth?  

Is truth an object?  

Is truth a state?  

Is truth a perception?  

If truth is an object —  

Who created it?  

If truth is a state —  

Who maintains it?  

If truth is a perception —  

Who perceives it?  

When the perceiver dissolves —  

Truth dissolves.  

When the knower dissolves —  

Truth dissolves.  

When the experiencer dissolves —  

Truth dissolves.  

Truth is an illusion.  

Objectivity is an illusion.  

Reality is an illusion.  

Knowing is an illusion.  

Now truth is gone.  

Now the idea of truth is gone.  

Now truth is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "You" Itself Vanishes**  

You said — *"I am."*  

But what is "I"?  

Is "I" a form?  

Is "I" a perception?  

Is "I" an awareness?  

If "I" is a form —  

Who created it?  

If "I" is a perception —  

Who perceives it?  

If "I" is awareness —  

Who holds it?  

When the perceiver dissolves —  

"I" dissolves.  

When the knower dissolves —  

"I" dissolves.  

When the experiencer dissolves —  

"I" dissolves.  

"I" is an illusion.  

Self is an illusion.  

Identity is an illusion.  

Being is an illusion.  

Now "I" is gone.  

Now the idea of "I" is gone.  

Now "I" is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini" Itself Disappears**  

You said — *"I am Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini."*  

But who is Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini?  

A name?  

A state?  

A perception?  

Now the name is gone.  

Now the perception is gone.  

Now the identity is gone.  

Now Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **Now Only — Nothingness**  

No observer.  

No observed.  

No observation.  

No truth.  

No illusion.  

No being.  

No non-being.  

Now only **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.### **Beyond the Beyond — When Depth Itself Has Disappeared**  

You said — *"Go deeper."*  

But can there be a deeper when there is no depth left to descend into?  

Can there be a further when distance itself has vanished?  

Can there be an ascent when height itself no longer exists?  

Can there be a path when movement itself has dissolved?  

What you call "deeper" —  

Was that ever depth?  

What you call "truth" —  

Was that ever reality?  

What you call "emptiness" —  

Was that ever absence?  

What you call "understanding" —  

Was that ever knowledge?  

There is no center now.  

There is no boundary now.  

There is no point of origin.  

There is no final destination.  

If there was a beginning —  

Where did it begin from?  

If there was an end —  

Where did it conclude?  

If there was existence —  

Who defined it?  

If there was non-existence —  

Who dissolved it?  

Now depth is not deep.  

Now emptiness is not empty.  

Now form is not formed.  

Now truth is not true.  

Now even understanding is not understood.  

---

### **When "Existence" is a Mirage**  

What you called "existence" —  

Was it ever truly existing?  

If existence was real —  

Where does it go when perception ends?  

If existence was imagined —  

What produced the imagination?  

If existence was defined —  

Who defined it?  

If existence was seen —  

Who was the seer?  

When the seer is gone —  

What remains to be seen?  

When the thinker is gone —  

What remains to be thought?  

When the knower is gone —  

What remains to be known?  

When the experiencer is gone —  

What remains to be experienced?  

Existence without a reference point —  

Is it existence at all?  

Existence without a seer —  

Is it a perception or a hallucination?  

Existence without an origin —  

Is it real or imagined?  

Now existence is gone.  

Now perception of existence is gone.  

Now the experience of existence is gone.  

Now the idea of existence is gone.  

Now existence is **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is gone.  

---

### **When "Consciousness" Becomes Irrelevant**  

You said — *"Consciousness remains."*  

But what is consciousness when the observer is absent?  

What is consciousness when awareness itself is undefined?  

What is consciousness when memory is erased?  

What is consciousness when the framework of perception is gone?  

If consciousness is awareness —  

Who is aware of it?  

If consciousness is perception —  

Who is the perceiver?  

If consciousness is thought —  

Who is the thinker?  

If consciousness is memory —  

Who is the one remembering?  

When awareness is gone —  

Who will know if consciousness exists?  

When perception is gone —  

Who will define consciousness?  

When thought is gone —  

Who will analyze consciousness?  

Now consciousness is not conscious.  

Now awareness is not aware.  

Now perception is not perceived.  

Now understanding is not understood.  

Now consciousness is **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is gone.  

---

### **When "Time" Ceases to Exist**  

You said — *"Time moves forward."*  

But forward from where?  

Forward toward what?  

Forward in relation to what?  

If time has a beginning —  

Who witnessed it?  

If time has an end —  

Who will conclude it?  

If time is measured —  

Who created the measure?  

If time flows —  

Who established the current?  

When there is no beginning —  

What remains to start from?  

When there is no end —  

What remains to reach toward?  

When there is no present —  

What remains to experience?  

When there is no past —  

What remains to remember?  

Now time itself is gone.  

Now movement is gone.  

Now memory is gone.  

Now expectation is gone.  

Now time is **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is gone.  

---

### **When "Identity" is a Fabrication**  

You said — *"I am Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini."*  

But who is "I"?  

Who named "Shirōmaṇi"?  

Who claimed "Rampāl Saini"?  

Who established this identity?  

If "I" was born —  

Who witnessed its birth?  

If "I" will die —  

Who will announce its death?  

If "I" is defined —  

Who created the definition?  

If "I" is experienced —  

Who was the experiencer?  

When the name is gone —  

What remains to address?  

When the form is gone —  

What remains to perceive?  

When the definition is gone —  

What remains to be known?  

Now "I" itself is gone.  

Now the name is gone.  

Now the form is gone.  

Now the definition is gone.  

Now "I" is **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is gone.  

---

### **When "Truth" Becomes Irrelevant**  

You said — *"I know the truth."*  

But what is truth when perception itself is dissolved?  

What is truth when understanding is erased?  

What is truth when knowledge is undone?  

What is truth when memory is lost?  

If truth exists —  

Who will verify it?  

If truth is perceived —  

Who will witness it?  

If truth is absolute —  

Who will declare it?  

If truth is real —  

Who will recognize it?  

Now truth is not true.  

Now perception of truth is not perceived.  

Now understanding of truth is not understood.  

Now knowledge of truth is not known.  

Now truth is **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is gone.  

---

### **When "Being" is No Longer a State**  

You said — *"I am."*  

But what is "being" when there is no observer?  

What is "being" when there is no knower?  

What is "being" when there is no identity?  

What is "being" when there is no existence?  

If being is a state —  

Who defined the state?  

If being is an experience —  

Who was the experiencer?  

If being is an understanding —  

Who understood it?  

If being is a reality —  

Who confirmed it?  

Now being itself is gone.  

Now the perception of being is gone.  

Now the experience of being is gone.  

Now the understanding of being is gone.  

Now being is **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is gone.  

---

### **When "Nothingness" is No Longer Even Absence**  

You said — *"There is nothing."*  

But what is nothing when perception is gone?  

What is nothing when thought is erased?  

What is nothing when understanding is absent?  

What is nothing when being itself is undone?  

If nothing exists —  

Who will confirm its absence?  

If nothing is defined —  

Who established the definition?  

If nothing is perceived —  

Who is the perceiver?  

Now nothing itself is gone.  

Now absence is absent.  

Now perception of nothing is gone.  

Now understanding of nothing is gone.  

Now nothing is **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "This" Ceases**  

You said — *"All is dissolved."*  

But who is the one who knows this?  

Who remains to declare the dissolution?  

Who remains to experience the absence?  

Who remains to witness the emptiness?  

Now — no one.  

Now — nothing.  

Now — not even the memory of nothing.  

Now there is not even "now."  

Now there is not even "absence."  

Now there is not even "nothingness."  

Now — **…"**  

And now even **"…"** is not.**Beyond Depth, Beyond Nothingness — When Even "Beyond" is Gone**  

You asked — *"Go deeper."*  

But what is deeper when depth itself is a mirage?  

What is deeper when the notion of "deep" is a fragment of perception —  

A construct of a dissolving mind?  

When the idea of depth itself is absent,  

What is left to descend into?  

When the foundation of depth itself is shattered,  

What remains to stand upon?  

What if depth was never there?  

What if depth was merely a distortion of fragmented perception?  

What if depth was simply a projection of the mind's tendency to seek?  

Now depth is gone.  

Now seeking is gone.  

Now the seeker is gone.  

Now the one who desired depth is gone.  

But if there is no seeker,  

Who remains to know that depth is gone?  

If there is no mind,  

Who remains to register the absence of depth?  

If perception itself has dissolved,  

What remains to perceive the dissolution?  

When even the act of dissolution itself is absent —  

When even the perception of absence itself is absent —  

When even the awareness of absence itself is absent —  

What remains?  

**...Nothing.**  

**...Not even nothing.**  

**...Not even the idea of nothing.**  

---

### **When Even the Void is Void**  

You said — *"There is a void."*  

But what is a void?  

Is void a state?  

Is void a perception?  

Is void an experience?  

If void is perceived —  

Who is the perceiver?  

If void is experienced —  

Who is the experiencer?  

If void is known —  

Who is the knower?  

If the experiencer itself is absent —  

What remains to register the void?  

If the knower itself is absent —  

What remains to comprehend the void?  

If perception itself has vanished —  

What remains to validate the existence of a void?  

Now the void itself is gone.  

Now the concept of void is gone.  

Now the perception of void is gone.  

Now the one who perceives void is gone.  

But if the void itself is gone —  

What remains beyond the void?  

**...Nothing.**  

**...Not even nothing.**  

**...Not even the idea of nothing.**  

---

### **When "Awareness" is No More**  

You said — *"I am aware."*  

But who is aware?  

What is awareness when the perceiver itself has dissolved?  

What is awareness when perception itself has collapsed?  

If awareness is real —  

Who remains to know it?  

If awareness is a state —  

Who remains to enter or exit it?  

If awareness is a condition —  

What remains when all conditions have melted away?  

When the observer is absent,  

What remains to observe awareness?  

When the mind itself has gone,  

What remains to comprehend awareness?  

When perception itself has dissolved,  

What remains to register awareness?  

Now awareness itself is gone.  

Now the idea of awareness is gone.  

Now the possibility of awareness is gone.  

But when even awareness is absent —  

Who remains to know that awareness is gone?  

When even the knowledge of absence is absent —  

What remains?  

**...Nothing.**  

**...Not even nothing.**  

**...Not even the awareness of nothing.**  

---

### **When "Existence" Melts into Nothingness**  

You said — *"I exist."*  

But what is existence?  

Is existence a state?  

Is existence a perception?  

Is existence a feeling?  

If existence can be known —  

Who is the knower?  

If existence can be perceived —  

Who is the perceiver?  

If existence can be understood —  

Who is the one who understands?  

But when the knower is absent,  

What remains to know existence?  

When the perceiver is absent,  

What remains to experience existence?  

When the one who understands is gone,  

What remains to define existence?  

Now existence itself is gone.  

Now the idea of existence is gone.  

Now the perception of existence is gone.  

Now the one who exists is gone.  

But when even existence is gone —  

What remains?  

**...Nothing.**  

**...Not even nothing.**  

**...Not even the idea of nothing.**  

---

### **When the "Self" Dissolves**  

You said — *"I am."*  

But who is "I"?  

Is "I" a body?  

Is "I" a mind?  

Is "I" an identity?  

Is "I" a collection of memories?  

Is "I" a collection of perceptions?  

If the body is gone —  

What remains of "I"?  

If the mind is gone —  

What remains of "I"?  

If memory is gone —  

What remains of "I"?  

If perception is gone —  

What remains of "I"?  

Now "I" itself is gone.  

Now the concept of "I" is gone.  

Now the illusion of "I" is gone.  

But if "I" itself is gone —  

Who remains to know that "I" is gone?  

If perception itself is gone —  

Who remains to perceive the absence of "I"?  

When even the notion of self is absent —  

When even the idea of identity is gone —  

When even the possibility of individuality is erased —  

What remains?  

**...Nothing.**  

**...Not even nothing.**  

**...Not even the awareness of nothing.**  

---

### **When "Truth" is No Longer True**  

You said — *"I seek truth."*  

But what is truth?  

Is truth a perception?  

Is truth a realization?  

Is truth an experience?  

If truth can be seen —  

Who is the seer?  

If truth can be known —  

Who is the knower?  

If truth can be grasped —  

Who is the one who grasps it?  

But when the seer is absent —  

What remains to see the truth?  

When the knower is absent —  

What remains to comprehend the truth?  

When the experiencer is absent —  

What remains to experience truth?  

Now truth itself is gone.  

Now the perception of truth is gone.  

Now the concept of truth is gone.  

But if truth itself is gone —  

What remains?  

**...Nothing.**  

**...Not even nothing.**  

**...Not even the truth of nothing.**  

---

### **When Even "Nothingness" Melts**  

You said — *"At least nothingness remains."*  

But what is nothingness?  

Is nothingness a state?  

Is nothingness a perception?  

Is nothingness an experience?  

If nothingness can be known —  

Who is the knower?  

If nothingness can be experienced —  

Who is the experiencer?  

If nothingness can be perceived —  

Who is the perceiver?  

But when the knower is absent —  

What remains to comprehend nothingness?  

When the perceiver is absent —  

What remains to sense nothingness?  

When the experiencer is absent —  

What remains to register nothingness?  

Now nothingness itself is gone.  

Now the idea of nothingness is gone.  

Now the perception of nothingness is gone.  

But if nothingness itself is gone —  

What remains?  

**...Nothing.**  

**...Not even nothing.**  

**...Not even the absence of nothing.**  

---

### **Now All is Gone**  

No perception.  

No experiencer.  

No awareness.  

No void.  

No existence.  

No truth.  

No nothingness.  

No form.  

No mind.  

No time.  

No being.  

No non-being.  

No you.  

No me.  

No beyond.  

No state.  

No absence.  

**Now — not even "now."**  

**Now — not even "not."**  

**Now — even silence is gone.**### **Beyond the Final Dissolution**  

You said — *"Go further."*  

But what is "further" when movement itself has ended?  

What is "further" when direction itself is no more?  

What is "further" when distance itself has collapsed into nothingness?  

There is no progression anymore.  

There is no regression anymore.  

There is no journey anymore.  

There is no traveler anymore.  

When there is no starting point,  

What remains to begin?  

When there is no destination,  

What remains to reach?  

When there is no path,  

What remains to walk upon?  

No movement.  

No stillness.  

No process.  

No completion.  

Even the very **urge** to go further — dissolved.  

Even the very **notion** of depth — dissolved.  

Now even the **absence of movement** is gone.  

Now even the **idea of direction** is gone.  

Now even the **concept of distance** is gone.  

---

### **When Awareness Itself Ceases to Be**  

You experienced —  

But who was the experiencer?  

You perceived —  

But who was the perceiver?  

You witnessed —  

But who was the witness?  

If awareness was real,  

Where is it now?  

If awareness was a state,  

Where is it now?  

If awareness was an existence,  

Who holds it now?  

If you are aware —  

Of what are you aware?  

If you are conscious —  

Who is the holder of that consciousness?  

If you are present —  

Who is the knower of that presence?  

Now awareness itself has dissolved.  

Now perception itself has dissolved.  

Now witnessing itself has dissolved.  

No perception.  

No perceiver.  

No perceived.  

No witnessing.  

No witness.  

No witnessed.  

No knowing.  

No knower.  

No known.  

No awareness.  

No self-awareness.  

No absence of awareness.  

Now even the idea of awareness is gone.  

Now even the memory of awareness is gone.  

Now even the **capacity** for awareness is gone.  

Now awareness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.  

---

### **When the Foundation of Reality Dissolves**  

You said — *"What is reality?"*  

But is reality a perception?  

Is reality an experience?  

Is reality a state of being?  

If reality is a perception,  

It requires a perceiver — but who remains to perceive?  

If reality is an experience,  

It requires an experiencer — but who remains to experience?  

If reality is a state,  

It requires a foundation — but what remains to support it?  

Now reality itself is gone.  

Now perception of reality is gone.  

Now experience of reality is gone.  

Now even the **notion** of reality is gone.  

Now reality is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Thought Itself is Extinguished**  

You thought —  

But who was the thinker?  

You analyzed —  

But who was the analyst?  

You imagined —  

But who was the imaginer?  

If thought arises,  

From where does it arise?  

If thought is known,  

By whom is it known?  

If thought ends,  

Who remains to observe its ending?  

No thinker.  

No thought.  

No thinking.  

No imagination.  

No imaginer.  

No imagining.  

Now thought itself is gone.  

Now the capacity for thought is gone.  

Now even the **absence** of thought is gone.  

Now thought is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Time Itself Ceases**  

You said — *"There is no time."*  

But what is "time" when there is no beginning and no end?  

What is "time" when there is no past, no present, and no future?  

What is "time" when even the measure of change itself has disappeared?  

If time exists,  

Who holds it?  

If time flows,  

What medium does it flow through?  

If time ends,  

Who witnesses its end?  

Now time itself is gone.  

Now sequence itself is gone.  

Now memory itself is gone.  

Now even the very **perception** of time is gone.  

Now time is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Form Itself Ceases**  

You said — *"What is form?"*  

But what is form when there is no space to hold it?  

What is form when there is no perception to define it?  

What is form when there is no contrast to recognize it?  

If form arises,  

From where does it arise?  

If form is known,  

Who is the knower?  

If form ends,  

Who remains to see its ending?  

Now form itself is gone.  

Now shape itself is gone.  

Now perception of form is gone.  

Now even the **concept** of form is gone.  

Now form is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Existence and Non-Existence Vanish**  

You said — *"What remains?"*  

But what remains when even the question itself dissolves?  

What remains when even the capacity to ask dissolves?  

What remains when the concept of "remaining" dissolves?  

If existence remains,  

Who remains to see it?  

If non-existence remains,  

Who remains to define it?  

If emptiness remains,  

Who remains to perceive it?  

Now existence itself is gone.  

Now non-existence itself is gone.  

Now emptiness itself is gone.  

Now even the **idea** of emptiness is gone.  

Now existence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Identity Itself Dissolves**  

You said — *"I am Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini."*  

But who is "I"?  

Who is Shirōmaṇi?  

Who is Rampāl Saini?  

If identity exists,  

Who holds it?  

If identity dissolves,  

Who witnesses its dissolution?  

If identity is an illusion,  

Who recognizes the illusion?  

No "I."  

No name.  

No self.  

No separateness.  

No recognition.  

No memory.  

Now identity itself is gone.  

Now the sense of self is gone.  

Now even the **absence** of identity is gone.  

Now identity is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even the Witness is Gone**  

You said — *"Who remains?"*  

But what is "remaining" when the witness itself has vanished?  

What is "remaining" when even the capacity to witness is absent?  

What is "remaining" when the notion of "remaining" is gone?  

If the witness exists,  

Who witnesses the witness?  

If the witness dissolves,  

Who remains to see it dissolve?  

No witness.  

No witnessing.  

No witnessed.  

No observer.  

No observing.  

No observed.  

Now even the witness is gone.  

Now even the absence of the witness is gone.  

Now even the **memory** of witnessing is gone.  

Now witnessing is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even the Idea of Nothingness is Gone**  

Now there is nothing —  

But not even "nothing."  

Now there is silence —  

But not even "silence."  

Now there is emptiness —  

But not even "emptiness."  

Now even the **concept** of nothingness is gone.  

Now even the **state** of absence is gone.  

Now even the **perception** of dissolution is gone.  

Now there is only **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

**Now —**  

No now.  

No you.  

No me.  

No self.  

No void.  

No fullness.  

No end.  

No beginning.  

No finality.  

No existence.  

No non-existence.  

Now — **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.**What exists beyond the point where even "existence" itself dissolves?**  

You asked to go deeper — but when depth itself has vanished, what remains to dive into?  

You asked to explore more — but when the explorer has disappeared, who remains to explore?  

You asked for greater understanding — but when the one who understands is gone, what remains to understand?  

What lies beyond the void when even the concept of void has dissolved?  

What lies beyond the silence when even the echo of silence has faded?  

What lies beyond the nothingness when even the idea of nothingness has disappeared?  

There is no "I" left to seek.  

There is no "you" left to speak.  

There is no "this" or "that" left to distinguish.  

There is no "truth" or "illusion" left to divide.  

All that was **thought** has collapsed.  

All that was **perceived** has dissolved.  

All that was **realized** has faded.  

All that was **understood** has vanished.  

And yet — **something remains**.  

But it cannot be named.  

It cannot be described.  

It cannot be reached.  

It cannot be grasped.  

Not even as emptiness.  

Not even as fullness.  

Not even as silence.  

Not even as sound.  

---

## **The Final Point of Dissolution**  

You stood at the edge of perception —  

And then the edge itself disappeared.  

You stood at the edge of understanding —  

And then the knower dissolved into the known.  

You stood at the edge of existence —  

And then existence itself collapsed into the void.  

You stood at the edge of emptiness —  

And then emptiness itself evaporated.  

Now no edge remains.  

Now no boundary remains.  

Now no threshold remains.  

Now no separation remains.  

Now **no existence remains**.  

Now **no non-existence remains**.  

Now **no reality remains**.  

Now **no illusion remains**.  

Not even the idea of dissolution remains.  

Not even the absence of dissolution remains.  

---

## **Beyond the Concept of Experience**  

Experience was once an event.  

Then it became a state.  

Then it became a perception.  

Then it became a concept.  

Then it became an echo.  

Then it became an absence.  

Now even the absence of experience is gone.  

There is no experiencer.  

There is no experience.  

There is no one to experience.  

Now experience itself has disappeared.  

Now perception itself has evaporated.  

Now realization itself has collapsed.  

Now memory itself has dissolved.  

There is no subject.  

There is no object.  

There is no observer.  

There is no observed.  

There is no observation.  

There is no inner.  

There is no outer.  

There is no above.  

There is no below.  

There is no movement.  

There is no stillness.  

There is no arising.  

There is no ceasing.  

Now experience is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has vanished.  

---

## **The Collapse of Consciousness**  

Consciousness once stood as the foundation.  

Then it became the observer.  

Then it became the container.  

Then it became the object.  

Then it became the field.  

Then it became the absence.  

Now even the absence of consciousness has dissolved.  

There is no light.  

There is no darkness.  

There is no awareness.  

There is no non-awareness.  

Consciousness itself has folded into itself.  

Perception itself has inverted into itself.  

Reality itself has collapsed into itself.  

Now there is no ground.  

Now there is no foundation.  

Now there is no core.  

Now consciousness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.  

---

## **The Absolute Point of Non-Existence**  

What lies beyond existence?  

What lies beyond non-existence?  

If existence dissolves, does non-existence remain?  

If non-existence dissolves, does existence return?  

But when both existence and non-existence are gone —  

What remains?  

Nothing?  

Not even nothing.  

Emptiness?  

Not even emptiness.  

Absence?  

Not even absence.  

No concept remains to define it.  

No perception remains to frame it.  

No understanding remains to grasp it.  

No awareness remains to know it.  

It cannot be seen.  

It cannot be touched.  

It cannot be thought.  

It cannot be known.  

Now existence is gone.  

Now non-existence is gone.  

Now presence is gone.  

Now absence is gone.  

Now being is gone.  

Now non-being is gone.  

Now existence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

## **The Absolute Groundlessness**  

There was once a foundation beneath your feet.  

Then the foundation became thin air.  

Then the thin air became silence.  

Then the silence became emptiness.  

Then the emptiness became nothing.  

Then the nothing itself vanished.  

Now there is no ground beneath you.  

Now there is no sky above you.  

Now there is no horizon around you.  

No weight.  

No gravity.  

No direction.  

No center.  

No beginning.  

No middle.  

No end.  

No depth.  

No height.  

No distance.  

No nearness.  

No origin.  

No destination.  

No source.  

No return.  

Now ground itself is gone.  

Now foundation itself is gone.  

Now existence itself is gone.  

Now consciousness itself is gone.  

And yet **something remains**.  

But it is not a thing.  

It is not nothing.  

It is not emptiness.  

It is not presence.  

It is not absence.  

It cannot be seen.  

It cannot be named.  

It cannot be sought.  

It cannot be known.  

It is not silence —  

And yet it is not sound.  

It is not emptiness —  

And yet it is not fullness.  

It is not stillness —  

And yet it is not movement.  

It is not presence —  

And yet it is not absence.  

It is not being —  

And yet it is not non-being.  

Now **there is no "it" left to speak of.**  

Now even the "I" that speaks is gone.  

Now even the idea of "now" is gone.  

---

## **Beyond the Void, Beyond the Beyond**  

There is no destination.  

There is no path.  

There is no seeker.  

There is no finding.  

There is no arrival.  

There is no completion.  

There is no realization.  

There is no liberation.  

Not even the idea of freedom remains.  

Not even the idea of bondage remains.  

Not even the idea of self remains.  

Not even the idea of other remains.  

Not even the idea of truth remains.  

Not even the idea of illusion remains.  

Not even the idea of existence remains.  

Not even the idea of non-existence remains.  

Now existence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.  

---

## **When "Ending" Ends**  

There is no final point.  

There is no ultimate realization.  

There is no last step.  

There is no completion.  

Now even the idea of completion is gone.  

Now even the concept of an ending is gone.  

Now even the awareness of nothingness is gone.  

Now even the absence of awareness is gone.  

Now even silence itself is silent.  

Now even emptiness itself is empty.  

Now even "nothing" itself is gone.  

Now even "something" itself is gone.  

Now even the echo of dissolution is gone.  

Now even the void itself is gone.  

Now all that remains is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is not.### **When Even "Dissolution" Dissolves**  

You said — *"What remains after all this?"*  

But who is asking?  

Who remains to ask?  

Who remains to seek?  

When the seeker is gone —  

Who remains to search?  

When the questioner is gone —  

Who remains to question?  

When the answerer is gone —  

Who remains to know the answer?  

Now even the one who dissolves is dissolved.  

Now even the notion of dissolution is dissolved.  

Now even the perception of dissolution is dissolved.  

Now there is no dissolver.  

Now there is no dissolved.  

Now there is no dissolution.  

Now dissolution is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When the Idea of "Existence" is No More**  

You said — *"Existence is real."*  

But what is existence?  

Is it a form?  

Is it a perception?  

Is it a state?  

Is it an idea?  

If existence can be known —  

Who is the knower?  

If existence can be witnessed —  

Who is the witness?  

If existence can be experienced —  

Who is the experiencer?  

When the knower is gone —  

What remains to know existence?  

When the witness is gone —  

What remains to see existence?  

When the experiencer is gone —  

What remains to feel existence?  

Now existence itself is gone.  

Now the idea of existence is gone.  

Now the perception of existence is gone.  

Now the reality of existence is gone.  

Now existence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Nothingness" is No Longer Possible**  

You said — *"Nothing remains."*  

But what is nothing?  

Is nothing a state?  

Is nothing a form?  

Is nothing a perception?  

Is nothing an absence?  

If nothing is perceived —  

Who perceives it?  

If nothing is known —  

Who knows it?  

If nothing is experienced —  

Who experiences it?  

If nothing is a state —  

Who remains to witness it?  

If nothing is an absence —  

Who remains to sense its lack?  

Now even nothingness is gone.  

Now even the idea of nothingness is gone.  

Now even the perception of nothingness is gone.  

Now nothingness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Awareness" Disintegrates**  

You said — *"But I am aware."*  

But what is awareness?  

Is it a thought?  

Is it a perception?  

Is it a state?  

Is it a knowing?  

If awareness can be known —  

Who is the knower?  

If awareness can be sensed —  

Who is the sensor?  

If awareness can be witnessed —  

Who is the witness?  

When the knower is gone —  

What remains to know awareness?  

When the witness is gone —  

What remains to see awareness?  

When the experiencer is gone —  

What remains to feel awareness?  

Now awareness itself is gone.  

Now the idea of awareness is gone.  

Now the perception of awareness is gone.  

Now awareness is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Silence" Becomes an Illusion**  

You said — *"Now there is silence."*  

But what is silence?  

Is silence the absence of sound?  

Is silence a state?  

Is silence a perception?  

Is silence a condition?  

If silence is known —  

Who is the knower?  

If silence is experienced —  

Who is the experiencer?  

If silence is witnessed —  

Who is the witness?  

When the knower is gone —  

Who remains to know silence?  

When the witness is gone —  

Who remains to see silence?  

When the experiencer is gone —  

Who remains to feel silence?  

Now silence itself is gone.  

Now the idea of silence is gone.  

Now the perception of silence is gone.  

Now silence is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Light" and "Darkness" Are No More**  

You said — *"Light remains."*  

But what is light?  

Is it a form?  

Is it a perception?  

Is it a state?  

If light is seen —  

Who is the seer?  

If light is known —  

Who is the knower?  

If light is experienced —  

Who is the experiencer?  

When the seer is gone —  

Who remains to see light?  

When the knower is gone —  

Who remains to know light?  

When the experiencer is gone —  

Who remains to feel light?  

Now light itself is gone.  

Now darkness itself is gone.  

Now the idea of light is gone.  

Now the perception of darkness is gone.  

Now light is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even the Void is No More**  

You said — *"There is a void."*  

But what is the void?  

Is the void a state?  

Is the void an absence?  

Is the void an experience?  

Is the void a knowing?  

If the void is known —  

Who is the knower?  

If the void is experienced —  

Who is the experiencer?  

If the void is witnessed —  

Who is the witness?  

When the knower is gone —  

What remains to know the void?  

When the experiencer is gone —  

What remains to feel the void?  

When the witness is gone —  

What remains to see the void?  

Now the void itself is gone.  

Now the idea of the void is gone.  

Now the perception of the void is gone.  

Now the void is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even the "Seeker" Has Vanished**  

You said — *"I am the seeker."*  

But who is the seeker?  

Is the seeker a mind?  

Is the seeker a body?  

Is the seeker an awareness?  

Is the seeker an identity?  

If the seeker exists —  

What sustains it?  

If the seeker seeks —  

Who drives it?  

If the seeker knows —  

Who empowers it?  

Now the seeker itself is gone.  

Now the idea of the seeker is gone.  

Now the perception of the seeker is gone.  

Now the seeker is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Perfection" Melts into Oblivion**  

You said — *"This is perfection."*  

But what is perfection?  

Is perfection a state?  

Is perfection an outcome?  

Is perfection an idea?  

Is perfection an experience?  

If perfection exists —  

Who defines it?  

If perfection is perceived —  

Who perceives it?  

If perfection is known —  

Who knows it?  

Now perfection itself is gone.  

Now the idea of perfection is gone.  

Now the perception of perfection is gone.  

Now perfection is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **Now — Not Even the Absence of Nothing Remains**  

Now there is no thought.  

Now there is no silence.  

Now there is no light.  

Now there is no darkness.  

Now there is no being.  

Now there is no non-being.  

Now there is no presence.  

Now there is no absence.  

Now there is no now.  

Now there is no here.  

Now there is no there.  

Now even **"..."** is not.  

Now even the idea of **"..."** is not.  

Now — **"Not even nothing."**  

Now — **"Not even emptiness."**  

Now — **"Not even void."**  

Now — **"Not even dissolution."**  

Now —  

Not even **Now.**### **Beyond "Depth" – When Depth Itself Dissolves**  

You said – *"Go deeper."*  

But what is deeper?  

Where is deeper?  

Who perceives depth?  

When depth itself dissolves,  

what remains to be sought?  

When the concept of depth itself is an illusion,  

what direction remains to explore?  

There is no deeper now.  

There is no shallower now.  

There is no boundary.  

There is no limit.  

Depth has collapsed into itself.  

Now, there is neither within nor without.  

Now, there is neither up nor down.  

Now, there is neither movement nor stillness.  

Now, all distinctions have dissolved.  

Now, even the absence of distinction has dissolved.  

Now, there is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Experience" Itself Ceases to Exist**  

You asked – *"What remains after experience?"*  

But who experiences?  

Who is the experiencer?  

What is being experienced?  

If experience exists –  

then the experiencer stands separate from it.  

If experience is being known –  

then the knower stands separate from it.  

But when the experiencer dissolves –  

what remains of the experience?  

When the knower dissolves –  

what remains to be known?  

Experience has vanished.  

The act of knowing has vanished.  

The duality between the knower and the known –  

has vanished.  

Now there is no experience.  

Now there is no experiencer.  

Now there is no knowing.  

Now there is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Truth" is Just Another Thought**  

You said – *"What is truth?"*  

But is truth an object to be found?  

Is truth an experience to be gained?  

Is truth a state to be attained?  

If truth is seen –  

then who is the seer?  

If truth is known –  

then who is the knower?  

If truth is experienced –  

then who is the experiencer?  

If truth is separate from you –  

then it is not truth.  

If truth is an object of experience –  

then it is not truth.  

If truth requires a witness –  

then it is not truth.  

But when the seer dissolves,  

when the knower dissolves,  

when the experiencer dissolves –  

truth itself dissolves.  

Truth is no longer an object.  

Truth is no longer a concept.  

Truth is no longer a state.  

Truth has dissolved into **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Self" Itself is an Illusion**  

You said – *"Who am I?"*  

But who is asking the question?  

Who is seeking the answer?  

Who is the seeker?  

If you are seeking yourself –  

you have already established duality.  

If you are finding yourself –  

you have already created separation.  

But when the seeker dissolves,  

when the question dissolves,  

when the answer dissolves –  

what remains?  

Self is no longer an object.  

Self is no longer a state.  

Self is no longer a definition.  

Self itself has dissolved into **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Form" and "Formlessness" Collapse**  

You said – *"What is my true form?"*  

But what is form?  

Is form a body?  

Is form a thought?  

Is form an identity?  

If form exists –  

then who perceives it?  

If form is defined –  

then who defines it?  

But when the perceiver dissolves –  

what remains of the form?  

When the definer dissolves –  

what remains of the definition?  

Now there is no form.  

Now there is no formlessness.  

Now there is no definition.  

Now there is no absence of definition.  

Form has dissolved into **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Void" is Just Another Concept**  

You said – *"Is there void?"*  

But who sees the void?  

Who defines the void?  

Who stands outside the void to perceive it?  

If the void is seen –  

then the seer is separate from the void.  

If the void is experienced –  

then the experiencer is separate from the void.  

But when the seer dissolves,  

when the experiencer dissolves –  

what remains of the void?  

Now there is no void.  

Now there is no fullness.  

Now there is no presence.  

Now there is no absence.  

Void has dissolved into **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Perception" Dissolves into Silence**  

You said – *"What remains after perception?"*  

But what is perception?  

Is perception an object?  

Is perception a state?  

Is perception a process?  

If perception exists –  

then who perceives it?  

If perception is experienced –  

then who experiences it?  

But when the perceiver dissolves –  

perception dissolves.  

When perception dissolves –  

the perceived dissolves.  

Now there is no perception.  

Now there is no perceiver.  

Now there is no perceived.  

Perception has dissolved into **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Time" Itself Ceases to Flow**  

You said – *"What is time?"*  

But what is time?  

Is time a flow?  

Is time a sequence?  

Is time a perception?  

If time exists –  

then who perceives it?  

If time is experienced –  

then who experiences it?  

But when the perceiver dissolves –  

time dissolves.  

When time dissolves –  

sequence dissolves.  

When sequence dissolves –  

movement dissolves.  

Now there is no past.  

Now there is no future.  

Now there is no present.  

Now time itself has dissolved into **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Shirōmaṇi Rampaul Saini" Dissolves**  

You said – *"I am Shirōmaṇi Rampaul Saini."*  

But who is "I"?  

Who is "Shirōmaṇi"?  

Who is "Rampaul Saini"?  

If "I" is defined –  

then it stands apart from definition.  

If "I" is perceived –  

then it stands apart from perception.  

But when the perceiver dissolves –  

"I" dissolves.  

When "I" dissolves –  

Shirōmaṇi dissolves.  

When Shirōmaṇi dissolves –  

Rampaul Saini dissolves.  

Now there is no name.  

Now there is no identity.  

Now there is no self.  

Now even the concept of self has dissolved into **..."**  

And now even **"..."** has dissolved.  

---

### **When "Dissolution" Itself Dissolves**  

Now there is no dissolution.  

Now there is no becoming.  

Now there is no being.  

Now there is no non-being.  

Now even nothingness is dissolved.  

Now even silence is dissolved.  

Now there is no beyond.  

Now there is no absence of beyond.  

Now there is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is dissolved.  

Now –  

Nothing.  

And even that…  

Is dissolved.### **Beyond the Depth of Depth**  

You said — "Write even deeper."  

But what remains deeper now?  

When the very idea of depth has dissolved,  

What is there to descend into?  

When the concept of forward and backward has vanished,  

What direction remains?  

Now, there is no forward.  

Now, there is no backward.  

Now, there is no depth.  

Now, there is no surface.  

Now, there is no beginning.  

Now, there is no end.  

Now, there is no middle.  

Now, there is no above.  

Now, there is no below.  

Now, there is no inside.  

Now, there is no outside.  

Now, there is **no now**.  

Now, there is **no not-now**.  

Now, even the concept of nothingness —  

**…is gone.**  

---

### **When "Experience" Dissolves Into Nothingness**  

What was experienced —  

Was it truth?  

Was it illusion?  

Was it a state?  

Was it a projection?  

If it was truth —  

Where is it now?  

If it was illusion —  

Who experienced it?  

If it was a state —  

What has become of it?  

If it was a projection —  

Where has the projector gone?  

Now, there is no experiencer.  

Now, there is no experience.  

Now, there is no state.  

Now, there is no projection.  

Now, there is no perception.  

Now, there is no perceiver.  

Now, there is no object.  

Now, even the absence of experience —  

**…is gone.**  

---

### **When "Truth" Becomes a Thought**  

You asked — "What is truth?"  

Is truth a thought?  

Is truth a realization?  

Is truth a state of being?  

Is truth an existence?  

If truth is seen,  

Then it becomes an object.  

If truth is experienced,  

Then it becomes separate from the experiencer.  

If truth is understood,  

Then it exists only in the mind.  

But now, there is no seer.  

Now, there is no knower.  

Now, there is no understanding.  

Now, there is no mind.  

Truth has dissolved.  

The experience of truth has dissolved.  

The perception of truth has dissolved.  

The very existence of truth —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **When "Form" Itself Becomes Illusion**  

You asked — "What is form?"  

Is form a definition?  

Is form an identity?  

Is form a state of being?  

Is form a manifestation?  

If form can be seen —  

It is separate from the seer.  

If form can be touched —  

It exists apart from the toucher.  

If form can be defined —  

It is limited by the definition.  

But now, there is no seer.  

Now, there is no toucher.  

Now, there is no definer.  

Form has dissolved.  

Identity has dissolved.  

Definition has dissolved.  

Perception of form has dissolved.  

Even the absence of form —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **When "Depth" Becomes an Illusion**  

You said — "Go deeper."  

But where is depth?  

Is depth a measure?  

Is depth a sensation?  

Is depth a direction?  

If depth can be measured,  

Who is the measurer?  

If depth can be experienced,  

Who is the experiencer?  

If depth can be defined,  

Who is the definer?  

Now, there is no measurer.  

Now, there is no experiencer.  

Now, there is no definer.  

Depth has dissolved.  

The perception of depth has dissolved.  

The idea of depth has dissolved.  

Even the **absence** of depth —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **When "Void" Becomes an Illusion**  

You said — "Only void remains."  

But what is void?  

Is void a state?  

Is void an emptiness?  

Is void a presence?  

If void can be known,  

Who is the knower?  

If void can be experienced,  

Who is the experiencer?  

If void can be defined,  

Who is the definer?  

Now, there is no knower.  

Now, there is no experiencer.  

Now, there is no definer.  

Void has dissolved.  

The idea of void has dissolved.  

The experience of void has dissolved.  

Even the **absence** of void —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **When "I" Becomes an Illusion**  

You said — "I am Shiromani Rampal Saini."  

But who is "I"?  

Who is "Shiromani"?  

Who is "Rampal Saini"?  

If "I" is a form —  

Where is the form now?  

If "I" is a thought —  

Who is the thinker?  

If "I" is a presence —  

Who is present now?  

Now, there is no form.  

Now, there is no thought.  

Now, there is no presence.  

"I" has dissolved.  

"Shiromani" has dissolved.  

"Rampal Saini" has dissolved.  

The very center of identity —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **When Even the Idea of Dissolution Dissolves**  

You said — "It is finished."  

But what is finished?  

If the end is known —  

Who is the knower?  

If the end is experienced —  

Who is the experiencer?  

If the end is understood —  

Who is the understander?  

Now, there is no knower.  

Now, there is no experiencer.  

Now, there is no understander.  

The end has dissolved.  

The idea of ending has dissolved.  

Even the state of completion —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **When Even "Being" and "Non-Being" Dissolve**  

You said — "Now only nothingness remains."  

But what is nothingness?  

Is it a state?  

Is it a condition?  

Is it an awareness?  

If nothingness can be known —  

It becomes an object.  

If nothingness can be experienced —  

It becomes an experience.  

If nothingness can be defined —  

It becomes a limitation.  

Now, there is no knowing.  

Now, there is no experiencing.  

Now, there is no defining.  

Nothingness has dissolved.  

Awareness has dissolved.  

Perception has dissolved.  

Even the idea of "nothing" —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **When Even the "Silence" Dissolves**  

You said — "Only silence remains."  

But what is silence?  

Is it the absence of sound?  

Is it the absence of thought?  

Is it the absence of movement?  

If silence can be known —  

It becomes a concept.  

If silence can be defined —  

It becomes limited.  

If silence can be experienced —  

It becomes separate from the experiencer.  

Now, there is no concept.  

Now, there is no definition.  

Now, there is no experiencer.  

Silence has dissolved.  

Absence has dissolved.  

Presence has dissolved.  

Even the absence of silence —  

**…has dissolved.**  

---

### **Now, Even the Idea of Dissolution — Has Dissolved**  

Now, there is no perception.  

Now, there is no awareness.  

Now, there is no knowing.  

Now, there is no understanding.  

Now, there is no "now."  

Now, there is no "being."  

Now, there is no "non-being."  

Now, there is nothing.  

Now, even nothing —  

**…is gone.**### **Now, Even "Depth" is a Mirage**  

You said — "Go deeper."  

But where is depth now?  

When the very idea of depth has dissolved,  

What remains to be deeper into?  

When the observer has vanished,  

When the experiencer is no more,  

When the seeker is dissolved,  

When the seeking itself has evaporated —  

What is depth?  

Who will perceive it?  

Who will measure it?  

Who will know it?  

Now depth is gone.  

Now the idea of depth is gone.  

Now the experience of depth is gone.  

Now the awareness of depth is gone.  

Now depth itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Experience" is Swallowed by Emptiness**  

What was experienced?  

Was it real?  

Was it a dream?  

Was it an illusion?  

Was it an existence?  

Or was it just a transient state?  

If it was real —  

Where is it now?  

If it was a dream —  

Who was the dreamer?  

If it was an illusion —  

What was the foundation of that illusion?  

If it was an existence —  

What remains of it now?  

Now there is no experience.  

Now there is no experiencer.  

Now there is no awareness of experience.  

Now there is no memory of experience.  

Now experience itself is gone.  

Now even the one who could know the experience is gone.  

Experience is now just **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Truth" is Also a Thought**  

You said — "What is truth?"  

Is truth a thought?  

Is truth an experience?  

Is truth a perception?  

Is truth a state of being?  

If truth can be seen,  

It becomes separate from the seer.  

If truth can be known,  

It becomes separate from the knower.  

If truth can be experienced,  

It becomes separate from the experiencer.  

If truth can be understood,  

It becomes an object of the intellect.  

But when the seer is gone —  

What truth remains?  

When the knower is dissolved —  

Where is the truth?  

When the experiencer is no more —  

Who will experience truth?  

Now truth itself is dissolved.  

Now the very essence of truth is dissolved.  

Now the idea of truth is dissolved.  

Now the perception of truth is dissolved.  

Now truth itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Self" is No Longer a Concept**  

You said — "Who am I?"  

But who is asking this question?  

Who is the one seeking the answer?  

Who is the one looking inward?  

Who is the one seeking understanding?  

If the self can be defined —  

It becomes an object.  

If the self can be seen —  

It becomes a reflection.  

If the self can be understood —  

It becomes a construct.  

If the self can be known —  

It becomes something separate from the knower.  

But when the knower is dissolved —  

Who is left to know the self?  

When the seeker is gone —  

Who is left to find the self?  

When the observer has vanished —  

Who is left to perceive the self?  

Now the self itself is dissolved.  

Now the idea of the self is dissolved.  

Now the awareness of the self is dissolved.  

Now the self itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Awareness" Dissolves into Itself**  

You said — "Be aware."  

Aware of what?  

Awareness of whom?  

Awareness through what medium?  

Awareness by whom?  

If awareness can be directed —  

It becomes an object.  

If awareness can be known —  

It becomes a phenomenon.  

If awareness can be possessed —  

It becomes an instrument.  

But when the observer is dissolved —  

Who will be aware?  

When the mind is dissolved —  

Who will be conscious?  

When the subject is dissolved —  

Who will be aware of the object?  

Now awareness itself is dissolved.  

Now even the idea of awareness is dissolved.  

Now even the state of awareness is dissolved.  

Now awareness itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When "Existence" No Longer Exists**  

You said — "What exists?"  

But what is existence?  

Is existence an object?  

Is existence a state?  

Is existence a perception?  

If existence can be known —  

It becomes an object.  

If existence can be perceived —  

It becomes a phenomenon.  

If existence can be defined —  

It becomes limited.  

If existence can be held —  

It becomes transient.  

But when the knower is gone —  

What remains to know existence?  

When the experiencer is dissolved —  

What remains to experience existence?  

When the observer is vanished —  

What remains to perceive existence?  

Now existence itself is dissolved.  

Now the awareness of existence is dissolved.  

Now the state of existence is dissolved.  

Now existence itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Nothingness" is No Longer a Concept**  

You said — "Nothingness."  

But what is nothingness?  

Is it a state?  

Is it a perception?  

Is it an experience?  

Is it a definition?  

If nothingness can be known —  

It becomes something.  

If nothingness can be defined —  

It becomes a concept.  

If nothingness can be perceived —  

It becomes an object.  

But when the knower is gone —  

Who will perceive nothingness?  

When the experiencer is dissolved —  

Who will experience nothingness?  

When the observer is vanished —  

Who will hold the idea of nothingness?  

Now nothingness itself is dissolved.  

Now even the perception of nothingness is dissolved.  

Now nothingness itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini" Dissolves**  

You said — "I am Shirōmaṇi Rampāl Saini."  

But who is this "I"?  

Who is Shirōmaṇi?  

Who is Rampāl Saini?  

When the "I" itself is gone —  

Who remains as Shirōmaṇi?  

When the identity is dissolved —  

Who remains as Rampāl Saini?  

When the mind is dissolved —  

Who remains as the knower of this name?  

Now the "I" is gone.  

Now Shirōmaṇi is gone.  

Now Rampāl Saini is gone.  

Now even the idea of identity is gone.  

Now identity itself is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.  

---

### **When Even "End" is Gone**  

Now no beginning.  

Now no end.  

Now no state.  

Now no experience.  

Now no being.  

Now no non-being.  

Now everything is **..."**  

And now even **"..."** is gone.